Home » Articles posted by Andy Hernandez
Author Archives: Andy Hernandez
Cultural Competency OSCE-Type Case #2
Clinical scenario:
91-year-old Hispanic male, Spanish- speaking, originally from Ecuador with a PMHx of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis presents to Geriatric Outpatient Clinic for a follow-up consultation accompanied by his two daughters. The family reports that the patient receives medical attention during his visits to New York, otherwise has a doctor in Ecuador that prescribes medication as needed. Patient is alert but after sitting on the exam chair appears somnolent but responds when loudly spoken to. Patient has reduced vision and hearing but doesn’t use glasses or a hearing aid despite these limitations. Recent labs show an A1c of 8.0 and his blood pressure is 144/80 mmHg. The daughters confirm that he regularly takes his metformin for diabetes management but does not take his prescribed antihypertensive medications, claiming his blood pressure readings are “normal” at home. However, the patient does not own a blood pressure monitor or keep a log of his readings. The patient has been prescribed both a cane and a walker due to a history of osteoporosis and a prior fall within the last year. However, his daughters admit that he refuses to use either mobility aid. They also report that he has difficulty sleeping, getting only about 4 hours of sleep each night, and frequently appears tired during the day, often taking brief naps. Otherwise, the patient admits to being in good health and has no complaints. Denies any current pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, urinary incontinence, loss of sensation to the extremities, or unintentional weight loss.
Why does the case require cultural awareness/humility:
Culture plays a significant role in how the Latin population approaches healthcare, with both the individual and the family contributing to decision-making. Understanding and integrating Latino cultural beliefs into medical practice is essential for providing effective, patient-centered care. By applying cultural humility and recognizing the patient’s unique cultural values, healthcare providers can build trust and deliver care that aligns more closely with the patient’s and family’s expectations. This is particularly important in the Latin population, where family involvement in healthcare decisions is emphasized, as seen in this case, with the patient’s reliance on his daughters for support and communication.
Respecting the patient’s cultural health perceptions, such as his views on chronic disease management and his hesitancy to accept recommended treatments like mobility aids, enables the healthcare provider to address these issues in a way that resonates with the patient’s values. Exploring why the patient chooses not to use his cane or walker, or why his family believes his blood pressure is normal at home even when it’s not measured, provides an opportunity to engage in culturally sensitive education that is more likely to encourage future behavior change.
Addressing potential barriers to care, such as language, is crucial, particularly because the patient is a native Spanish speaker. Offering access to professional interpreters or a Spanish-speaking provider can prevent miscommunication and ensure that the patient fully understands his treatment plan.
This culturally competent approach not only improves health outcomes but also fosters trust, satisfaction, and respect between the patient, family, and provider. Failing to integrate cultural beliefs into practice limits the ability to deliver effective healthcare to this patient population and can contribute to health disparities within the Latino community. For example, misunderstandings about medication adherence or the importance of regular monitoring could lead to poorly managed chronic conditions like diabetes or hypertension,. Therefore, integrating cultural beliefs into care is critical for reducing disparities, improving patient engagement, and achieving equitable healthcare outcomes.
The cultural factors that need to be considered:
1. Language Barriers and Communication: The patient is a native Spanish speaker and currently relies entirely on his daughters for translation. However, this can lead to communication inaccuracies and omissions, not only during the visit but also regarding medication instructions, which are in English. To prevent confusion, it is better to have a provider who speaks the patient’s native language or, at the very least, offer access to a medical interpreter or interpretation service.
2. Health Beliefs: The patient comes from a different generation and culture, which influences his perceptions of illness and treatments. In Latin culture, men often struggle to admit they are ill, as doing so might make them appear weak. Many times, patients may decline treatment if they feel fine and only agree when the illness is perceived as severe or shows symptoms. Understanding these perceptions and respectfully navigating them can lead to a more effective care plan that aligns with the patient’s preferences.
3. The Family’s Role in Care: In Latin culture, family plays a significant role in healthcare decisions, particularly for older patients, as seen in this case. Some patients may rely heavily on family members to make medical decisions. Providers must recognize the importance of family involvement, as this helps ensure that both the patient’s and the family’s preferences are heard and respected, leading to more satisfactory outcomes for all parties involved.
4. Relationship between Patient and Provider: Latin patients often prefer a warm, personal relationship with their healthcare providers. More formal, business-like interactions that feel cold may be off-putting to patients. If the relationship is purely business-like, the patient may be less inclined to ask questions or fully understand the disease and treatment plan, which can hinder a collaborative approach to care.
Any beliefs that might be different from western medicine beliefs and Areas Where Conflict Might Develop:
1. Cultural Perceptions of Health: The patient in this case comes from an older generation where men place significant emphasis on appearing strong, especially to others. As a result, Latino patients may have a different understanding of chronic disease and preventive care. They might believe that if they feel fine, there is no need to take medication or follow medical advice, as taking medications or treatments may be seen as a sign of weakness. In Western medicine, there is a belief that taking proactive measures is essential to prevent health from worsening into something more serious. Therefore, careful consideration should be given to offering alternatives that allow the patient to maintain his self-image while also ensuring his safety.
2. Patient-Provider Dynamics: In Latin American cultures, patients often view healthcare providers as authoritative figures who possess the knowledge and power to heal. Out of respect for authority, or fear of questioning the provider, they may hesitate to challenge the treatment plan. Additionally, many Latino patients, particularly immigrants, may feel vulnerable, which can cause them to appear passive or non-communicative during visits. This behavior may be misinterpreted as noncompliance or disinterest, when in fact, they may simply be afraid to speak up. This can be problematic, as our goal is to provide patient-centered care where the provider and patient work collaboratively to determine the best course of action. Encouraging the patient to ask questions and reassuring them that they are not obligated to follow any plan they don’t agree with can help open communication. If they don’t agree with a recommendation, exploring alternative options should be encouraged.
3. Religious Beliefs in Healing: Many Latino patients have strong Catholic or Christian beliefs and may turn to their faith for solutions to medical problems. Depending on the importance of religion in their lives, they may believe that illness and healing are in the hands of God, and that prayer, faith, and religious rituals are essential components of the healing process. This belief may coexist with or even take precedence over the use of medical treatments.
4. Use of Alternative Medicine: The use of alternative medicine is also common among Latino patients, who may integrate traditional remedies with Western medical practices. They may view herbs or home remedies as safer than pharmaceuticals. This can create conflicts, as these remedies may cause interactions with prescribed medications, potentially worsening the situation. Providers must remain open-minded and non-judgmental, understanding the patient’s use of alternative treatments. If alternative remedies are being used, it’s important to assess whether they are safe to combine with the current treatment plan.
What would be expected of the student in demonstrating Cultural Competence/Humility:
1. Language Barriers and Communication: The student must ensure that a qualified medical interpreter is present to facilitate clear communication. It is crucial to speak directly to the patient rather than only addressing the daughters, even if they assist with translation. Additionally, the student should build rapport and set aside enough time to develop trust with the patient. Latino patients typically prefer a warm and personal relationship with their providers, and they appreciate feeling unhurried during consultations.
2. Understanding the Patient’s Health Beliefs: The student recognizes that the patient, coming from a different generation and cultural background, may have differing views on health. The student should be mindful that the patient may resist treatment if he feels fine. By understanding and respecting these beliefs, the student can collaborate to create a treatment plan that aligns with the patient’s preferences.
3. Understanding Familial Roles: In Latin culture, families often play a significant role in healthcare decisions. The student should actively involve the patient’s daughters, ensuring they feel heard while also ensuring that the patient remains the central decision-maker if he has the capacity. The student should recognize that the family can play a strong role in supporting the patient’s decisions.
4. Alternative Medicine: The student should inquire about the patient’s use of any alternative medicine, such as herbal remedies, without dismissing or disrespecting the value these remedies may hold for the patient.
5. Religious and Spiritual Beliefs: Latino patients often have strong religious beliefs that may influence how they perceive health, illness, and healing. The student should inquire about any religious practices or spiritual needs and be willing to accommodate those in the treatment plan.
6. Encouraging Patient-Centered Care: The student should recognize that the patient may feel vulnerable, especially as an immigrant navigating the U.S. medical system. Demonstrating compassion, empathy, and understanding of the patient’s cultural background is essential for building trust. The student should emphasize shared decision-making, encourage the patient to ask questions and express concerns, and help him make informed decisions about his treatment plan.
Any patient counseling or education that would be required in the situation:
1. Diabetes Management: Educate the patient on the importance of A1c monitoring. Discuss maintaining blood sugar levels within target ranges to prevent long-term complications such as kidney disease, nerve damage, and vision problems. Ask the patient about his dietary habits and consider a referral to a nutritionist. Reinforce the importance of taking metformin regularly, even if the patient feels well, to control blood sugar levels and prevent complications. Listen to and consider any objections.
2. Hypertension Management: Educate the patient and his family about the risks associated with untreated high blood pressure, including heart disease, stroke, and kidney damage, even if the patient feels fine. Emphasize that feeling well does not necessarily mean blood pressure is under control. Since the patient does not own a blood pressure monitor or diary, prescribe one and encourage the family to monitor and record the patient’s blood pressure at home. Inquire about any resistance the patient may have to taking his blood pressure medication to help him feel understood.
3. Fall Prevention: Address the patient’s reluctance to use a cane or walker by explaining how these devices can prevent future falls and injuries. Falls are particularly dangerous for this patient population, as they can lead to fractures and even fatalities. Using walking aids can help maintain current independence and avoid hospitalizations.
4. Sleep Hygiene: Offer advice on maintaining a regular sleep schedule, reducing naps, and creating a relaxing bedtime routine to improve sleep quality. Ask if the patient considers medication like melatonin to aid with sleep. In Latin culture, many people consume coffee in the afternoons, which should be explored, as it can affect sleep.
5. Individuality: Although the patient comes from a Latin background, it is important not to assume that all Latin patients are the same or hold the same beliefs. Each patient is an individual, regardless of ethnic categorization. Take the time to learn about their preferences and emphasize the importance of adhering to medications and following a treatment plan. If the patient has any issues, they must be addressed, and alternatives should be explored to accommodate the patient and effectively implement a patient-centered approach.
Self Reflection
During my recent long-term care geriatrics rotation at Metropolitan Hospital, I had the privilege of experiencing firsthand the unique challenges and complexities of caring for older adults. This rotation was a rich learning experience, exposing me to learn about the many geriatric syndromes and providing insight into the numerous physical, cognitive, and social issues that patients face as they age. Working with Dr. Kotchev, an internal medicine and geriatrics specialist, was an invaluable part of this experience. Not only is he highly knowledgeable, but his dedication to teaching and patience in explaining complex concepts was truly inspiring. His thorough approach to the geriatric assessment and the physical exam impressed upon me the importance of a detailed examination, a skill that, in my view, has become something of a “lost art” in medicine.
Under Dr. Kotchev’s guidance, I performed a cardiovascular exam, neuro exam, and musculoskeletal assessment each day. Observing his methodical approach helped me appreciate the significance of these exams in identifying subtle yet impactful health changes in geriatric patients. I particularly valued the opportunity to strengthen my own physical exam skills and gain deeper insights into common geriatric challenges, such as polypharmacy and the management of chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Dr. Kotchev emphasized the importance of ambulation and gait assessment, which are crucial for helping patients maintain independence in their daily lives.
This rotation also highlighted areas I need to develop further. For example, creating a treatment plan on the spot remains a challenge for me, though I am confident this skill will improve with time and experience. Throughout the rotation, I practiced history-taking, comprehensive reviews of systems, and performing head-to-toe exams, all of which reinforced my understanding of differential diagnoses. As I reflect on my time in geriatrics, I feel I am becoming a more well-rounded student, with a stronger foundation in the fundamentals of patient care. The rotation was very inspirational and deepened my appreciation for the complexity of geriatric medicine.
Overall, I am incredibly grateful for the opportunity to complete this rotation. It was an experience that not only strengthened my clinical abilities but also deepened my commitment to providing thoughtful and thorough care to patients, especially those facing the unique challenges of aging.
Journal Article Summary
Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in the elderly?
Tiago C C Pinto1, Leonardo Machado1, Tatiana M Bulgacov1, Antônio L Rodrigues-Júnior1, Maria L G Costa1, Rosana C C Ximenes1, Everton B Sougey1
With the prevalence of dementia increasing, especially in the geriatric population, there is a growing emphasis on early diagnosis and intervention. Mild cognitive impairment is a cognitive disorder with characteristics that fall between normal cognition and dementia (decline in cognitive abilities and functions), often serving as a precursor to dementia, with an annual conversion rate ranging from 6% to 31%. Therefore, diagnosing mild cognitive impairment is essential for preventative and therapeutic interventions in the early stages of disease. The Mini-Mental State Examination has been the most widely used screening instrument for decades; however, newer assessments like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, developed in 2005, are now available.
This study is a systematic review that investigates whether the Montreal Cognitive Assessment outperforms the Mini-Mental State Examination in identifying mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease among the elderly. The review evaluated 34 studies comparing these tools for detecting mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Results show that the Montreal Cognitive Assessment is generally superior in identifying mild cognitive impairment, especially in elderly individuals with lower educational backgrounds. Additionally, the Mini-Mental State Examination demonstrated lower accuracy among highly educated elderly individuals due to a “ceiling effect,” where educated individuals with mild cognitive impairment tend to score similarly to cognitively healthy individuals. This difference is likely due to the design of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, which includes more complex items, such as cube drawing and clock drawing, and a longer delay time for recall, making the test more challenging and thus more sensitive to mild cognitive impairment.
Some studies noted that adjusting the cut-off scores based on education level could further improve the accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, particularly for individuals with less formal education. Both tests, however, are effective in detecting Alzheimer’s disease.
Reference:
Pinto, T. C. C., Machado, L., Bulgacov, T. M., Rodrigues-Júnior, A. L., Costa, M. L. G., Ximenes, R. C. C., & Sougey, E. B. (2019). Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in the elderly?. International psychogeriatrics, 31(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610218001370
MoCA-vs.-MMSESite Evaluation Presentation
During my geriatrics rotation, I completed two site evaluations with Arti, PA-C from NYPQ. These evaluations were very informative as I presented patient cases and was tested on pharmacology cards that I created based on medications frequently encountered in my rotation. Each evaluation session was structured to encourage active learning and peer collaboration.
In my first evaluation, I presented a case involving a patient with a chronic cough, which we were investigating as a potential result of pneumonia or an exacerbation of congestive heart failure. After I shared my case, Arti assessed my pharmacology knowledge by reviewing the drug cards I had prepared. Following our individual presentations, Arti led a group discussion on a new case, which was a patient presenting with diarrhea. As a group, we worked through the steps of formulating a comprehensive workup. This interactive approach was highly beneficial, and I believe incorporating case discussions like these are valuable for all participants in the evaluation.
In my second evaluation, I presented another case, this time involving a patient for whom the geriatrics team was consulted on the internal medicine floor. This case was particularly memorable because it involved a patient with a history of recent falls. We conducted a thorough cognitive and neurological evaluation, which led us to consider several differential diagnoses, including various types of dementia and conditions like normal pressure hydrocephalus. The patient exhibited significant changes in cognition, memory, personality, ambulation, and coordination, making the case both complex and emotionally challenging due to the noticeable deterioration in their condition. This experience really showed me the diagnostic power of the physical exam in narrowing down differentials before ordering any additional labs or imaging.
As part of the second evaluation, I presented a research article comparing the efficacy of the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for diagnosing mild cognitive impairment. I chose this paper to introduce my peers to the MoCA, as MMSE is typically emphasized in school, yet other tools like MoCA can offer valuable insights into cognitive function.
To conclude the evaluation, Arti shared a set of multiple-choice questions with us, which we completed as a group. This activity was not only engaging but also excellent practice, as it reinforced key concepts and challenged us to think critically. I am grateful for the supportive and collaborative environment Arti fostered, which made each session a rewarding learning experience.